Debian OS preference?

You mentioned you prefer using Debian for your OS and I noticed you like using Thunderbird. I was just wondering which distro you prefer? I might like to try it myself if there is a live version.

I recommend Debain -

Reproducible builds - Although not perfect this is our last best hope for not getting backdoors in the operating system. Debian is part of a small number of projects attempting this.
Security - Is a top priority. Fax bug fixes. A security audit team. Public disclosure for fast bug fixes. Bugs can be tracked publicly.
The reasons here;

"Debian’s packages are divided into three main categories: Unstable, Testing, and Stable. A new package enters stable, and transfers into Testing when it has been debugged. When an official release is prepared, the current packages in Testing under further examination, and are eventually become the new Stable.

In recent years, other repositories have been officially or unofficially added, such as Experimental, Old Stable, Security, Backports ,and Update. However, users should pay most attention to the three main repositories.

The advantage of Debian’s system is that you can choose a position anywhere between two extremes: rock-solid stability, at the cost of older versions of software, or cutting edge, at the cost of less robust software and, at times, drastic changes in technology that can cripple an unwary user’s system. The choice can depend on whether you upgrade a core component, such as the Linux kernel, or a self-contained utility with its own libraries that affects nothing else when disaster strikes.

By contrast, Ubuntu derives its packages from Debian Unstable or Testing. Instead of being organized by testing status, Ubuntu’s repositories are organized by other criteria. Main contains software supported by Canonical, Universe software supported by the Ubuntu Community. Restricted contains proprietary drivers, while Multiverse holds software with copyright or legal limitations.

Another major difference is that Debian is much more dedicated to software freedom. By default, it installs only free software, and its installer even goes so far as to offer a kernel free of proprietary firmware. If you want nonfree software, you have add the Contrib and Nonfree sections to each repository.

By contrast, the distinction between free and proprietary is much less clear in Ubuntu. While Debian discourages the use of proprietary software (although allowing users to make their own choice), Ubuntu encourages users to install proprietary software in order to have a computing experience comparable to that on any commercial operating system. You can get the same experience on Debian if you are willing to work, but Debian makes clearer that you do so at the expensive of software freedom."

I am not super familiar with Debian but I do have experience with Ubuntu, Fedora, CentOS and currently using Linux Mint. But I might give Debian a try it won’t hurt. I did try a live CD of Debain recently but it had no wifi drivers installed although Kali had no issues with finding a working driver. And I know it’s now based on Debian after they switched from Backtrack 5.

Debian is a choice based with a security bias. It depends how important security is to you! If your very series you might look at a security focused OS like Qubes. OS.

Not the easiest Distro to install. It has to be the most challenging Distro I’ve done yet. But I got my dual boot back up and running and I am starting to get everything back in order and installing packages and stuff. We will see how I like it. The great thing about Linux is if you don’t like one Distro there are only a 1000+ more to try.

Yes on the down side its not easy but that because they dont ship everything under the sun with it so that everything works.

Well not everything worked haha but I have a newer computer. So I has to google and fix a few things to get the display and wifi to work and a few other strange things. Kali installed much easier for me and worked now problems. But it’s suppose to work on anything